More blogs about Creation Evidence.
Creation Evidence: Evidence for Design

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Evidence for Design

The first sentence of Carl Sagan's book, COSMOS, states, "The cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be."[1] In fact, this was a trademark statement for him--he made the same statement in his opening lines in the COSMOS[2]documentary series by NOVA. In Sagan's view, "The cosmos is all there is..." means there is only matter and energy in the universe. There is no God and there is no intelligent design to the universe. If he is correct, then where did information come from?

Stephen C. Meyer of the Discovery Institute explains the nature of information in a video clip, "Extras," from the Unlocking the Mystery of Life DVD.[3] Meyer describes teaching his students about information by holding up two computer disks. One disk is blank while the other is full of information. He asks, "What's the difference in mass between these two computer disks, as a result of the difference in the information content that they possess?" The answer is a resounding, "Zero, zilch, nada," because information is as Meyer says, "a massless quantity". Meyer then concludes, " Now if information is not a material entity, then how can any materialistic explanation explain its origin?" Therefore, if a material or natural cause cannot explain the origin of information then all that is left is a supernatural cause. But what is information?
If one was to happen upon a sign that says, "Do Not Enter", no one would wonder if the information from the sign might have arrived by natural causes. Also, if while walking on the beach one sees a large heart with the words, "I love you" written in the center of it, the observer would never conclude that those words had been formed by waves, wind or some other natural source. Any time we see information, we know that it comes from an intelligent source. What about the information found in DNA?

Deoxyribonucleic acid is a set of assembly instructions for the rest of the cell, organism or being. Dr. Warner Gitt, the author of In the Beginning Was Information writes, "DNA molecules contain the highest-known packing density of information. This exceedingly brilliant storage method reaches the limit of the physically possible, namely down to the level of single molecules."[4] Therefore, biological information provides the most complex and dense information known. In addition, Richard Dawkins, in The Blind Watchmaker writes, "There is enough storage capacity in the DNA of a single lily seed or a single salamander sperm to store the Encyclopedia Britannica 60 times over."[5] We see that DNA is not a concatenation of random letters, but is ordered, complex, dense and contains a huge volume of information.

Gitt provides a detailed look at information, dividing it into five levels. Wherever information is found, it fits these five levels. These can be illustrated with a STOP sign. The first level, statistics, tells us the STOP sign is one word and has four letters. The second level, syntax, requires the information to fall within the rules of grammar such as correct spelling, word and sentence usage. The word STOP is spelled correctly. The third level, semantics, provides meaning and implications. The STOP sign means that when we walk or drive and approach the sign we are to stop moving, look for traffic and proceed when it is safe. The fourth level, pragmatics, is the application of the coded message. It is not enough to simply recognize the word STOP and understand what it means; we must actually stop when we approach the sign. The fifth level, apobetics, is the overall purpose of the message. The STOP signs are placed by our local government to provide safety and traffic control. The code in DNA completely conforms to all five of these levels of information.

DNA is made up of a code of 4 letters (statistics). The four DNA letters, like the 26 letters of the English alphabet, are arranged into a code (syntax). The DNA code is a form of language that communicates with RNA (semantics). Not only are instructions communicated, but they are carried out in the cell, creating various organelles (pragmatics). The DNA provides the instructions to build the various organelles in order to maintain the cell (apobetics). This brief summary of Gitt’s five levels demonstrates the depth of the information in DNA as being dependent upon an intelligent source.

If Sagan was alive today and was challenged with the information argument, he would probably give a response like, “Scientists have not discovered the answers to ultimate questions, but given time they will.” This is what one of my readers says to the ultimate irreducible complexity argument.

However, there are only two possible explanations for the existence of the universe and life. One is a natural cause and the other is a supernatural cause. Evolutionists eliminate the supernatural cause as being scientifically invalid; therefore, they dismiss any arguments in favor of a supernatural cause as being religious. However, creationists offer both the natural cause and the supernatural cause and then ask, "Where does the evidence lead?" Meanwhile, evolutionists, instead of following the evidence, force the evidence into a naturalistic explanation of the universe. Logically, when given both options, a natural cause for the origin of DNA or a supernatural cause, the logical and scientific choice is the supernatural cause. Indeed, information as seen in DNA, comes as close to proving God’s existence as I think one can get.

[1] Sagan, C. (1960). Cosmos (p. 1) New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
[2] Cosmos Boxed Set [Film Series]. (2002). Cosmos Studios
[3] Unlocking the Mystery of Life [Film]. (2002). La Habra, CA: Illustra Media.
[4] Gitt, W. (1997). In the Beginning Was Information (p. 195). Bielefeld, Germany: Christliche Literatur-Verbreitung.
[5] Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker (pp. 115-116). New York: W.W. Norton.

4 Comments:

At 10:56 AM, September 26, 2005, Anonymous limbodog said...

Why does the information have to come from somewhere? I think 'beginning' and 'end' are rather human concepts that we try to apply to everything we see.

 
At 11:32 AM, October 03, 2005, Blogger Jim Bendewald said...

limbodog said, "Why does the information have to come from somewhere?"

The alternative is for information to come from nowhere. That is hardly scientific.

 
At 7:45 PM, October 30, 2005, Anonymous dbigelow said...

Good answer Jim!

 
At 12:46 AM, December 21, 2005, Anonymous dead eddy said...

information is merely human interpretation of the phenomenon that is nature. clearly, a man who does not understand english (or is blind) will not care for the STOP sign. and then there are those that DONT care for it. if youve ever taken a stroll in chinatown, you will understand what i mean. and information is physical-->the disks have been changed by adding information to them. i am astonished that Mr. Meyer doesnt know how information is recorded onto CDs. if i were to punch him in the face, he would suffer no reduction in mass yet he would have changed no? Or if i set his office on fire, there would still be an equalibrium in the total amount of energy that was the "room" would still be the same but i doubt he can call it his office anymore yet, none of these acts come from god--?they were random acts of violence commited by a man who does not feel empathy for the world around him and feels no moral wrong in doing such things (ie sociopath). words aren't always derived from an intelligent source: there are plenty of idiots out there who make up words like "nucular". if a word can be created by mistakes or lack of intelligence (ie, Bushism), then it seriously calls into doubt whether or not words are always derived from an intelligent source. the argument for DNA is also rather off. the majority of our DNA is junk. useless. why would we have it then if it does not go into the final step of apobetics? or even pragmatics, the step right before? how about the fact that DNA does not equate to who we actually are? isn't there a debate of nature vs nurture? and information has to come from somewhere. it comes from the reality that we percieve and that is translated into what we know as information.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home